No two DUI cases are the same in Washington State

Recently I met with someone who asked me a question that I get on a fairly regular basis, so I thought I would post my response here.  The question was, well I guess it was more of a half statement and half question.  Essentially it was, "My friend got a DUI.  He had a similar breath test, we did the same on the field sobriety tests, and he had never been in trouble before and he got a certain plea deal.  Can I get the same deal?"

As I said above I get this question fairly often.  From possible clients, to actual clients, to fellow lawyers asking my opinion about a case, or even curious friends.  It seems everyone knows someone who got a certain plea deal, or they have a friend of a friend who got a plea deal, and they had the same facts and breath test.  So the logical inference would be can they get the same deal if not better.  In felony land there is something called sentencing guidelines that outline what certain offenses carry as far as sentences.  But unfortunately DUI land, no case is the same.  There are just too many variables.

For example lets consider two DUI cases in two different jurisdictions both with a .14 breath test, and the both where the defendant has no criminal history.  You would think there would be some uniformity in Washington state where both those cases would get resolved in the same manner in terms of plea deal, sanctions, etc.  But even with those stats of .14 breath test, no criminal history, the case can be dramatically different both in terms of evidence, and the end result.  Why is that?

Well first if they occurred in different jurisdictions then you're dealing with two separate courts, two separate Prosecutors, basically two separate everything.  In other words I have appeared in most Courts in Western Washington and even several in Spokane County.  I can tell you there no two Courts that are the same.  Some courts have different types of plea deals.  Some courts have different "sentencing guidelines" when it comes to DUIs.  Additionally there are no two Prosecutors who are the same.  Different philosophies on negotiating, different caseloads, different relationships, etc.  All of these ultimately factor into the end result.  

Another huge difference in those two DUI cases of a .14 I used as an example would be the evidence.  From the reason for the stop, to the signs of impairment noted by the arresting officer inside the vehicle, to the performance on the field sobriety tests, to any statements made by the driver.  All of these factor into a resolution for a DUI case, and I would be willing to go out on a limb here and say no two cases are exactly the same when you look at those factors.  Even if both cases ended a .14 breath test.  

And lastly would be who the arresting officer was.  In my career I have seen officers who are absolutely horrible in their investigation, administration of the field sobriety tests and breath tests, and in their documentation of the arrest.  Likewise I have seen officers who conduct a thorough investigation, who administered the field sobriety tests and breath tests by the book, and who wrote a 7 page police report documenting every little thing they observe.  Now let me ask you this.  Who is more likely to have the better case from a Defense perspective?  The officer who did everything by the book, and thoroughly documented everything.  Or the officer who didn't do anything correctly, and only wrote a 2 paragraph police report that is inconsistent, and holes in it. 

So in the end what do I tell those people that ask this question.  Well I try to explain exactly what I wrote above.  That no two cases are the same, that there are too many variables, etc.  But what I can tell them is in my experience if an individual has never been in trouble before, they weren't involved in a serious car accident, they don't have an extremely high breath test, and they were somewhat polite with the officer then in those cases Prosecutors seem to be more lenient and receptive to the idea of reducing a DUI charge. 

_

Matthew A. Leyba is a DUI lawyer in Seattle, WA.  His practice focuses on representing those accused of DUI and other serious traffic offenses.  If you have been arrested for DUI contact our office immediately to ensure your constitutional rights are protected.  

 

Field Sobriety Test FAQs and other thoughts

Lately I have had several potential clients accused of DUI meet with me and have some interesting issues with the Field Sobriety Tests or FSTs for short.  The purpose of this article is to kind of clear the air on people’s misconceptions about these tests, whether you should take them, and how accurate they are.The FSTs are a battery of tests that police officers will ask that you complete, usually while on the side of the road, when investigating for DUI, so they can “make sure you aren’t too impaired to drive.”  These tests are completely voluntary and you have the option to decline them.  Since they are voluntary.  Don't do the Field Sobriety tests!  Let me repeat, don’t do these tests, I cant tell you how many former clients I have still do these tests.  Remember they don’t satisfy any court requirement and they usually only incriminate you further on your DUI. 

So what are they?  There are 3 main SFST’s that are employed by most of the law enforcement agencies in Washington State when investigating a DUI

1.  The first is one of the most well known among civilians – the officer waiving a pen in front of your face and telling you to follow it with your eyes. This test is known as Horizontal Gaze Nystagmus (HGN). The officer will slowly move a stimulus (usually a pen) in front of your eye (right to left, or left to right) to determine whether your eyes are able to track the pen in a smooth manner (checking for nystagmus – an involuntary jerking of your eyes).

2.  The second test that will usually be asked to complete is the Walk and Turn. The officer will have you stand in a starting position while you are listening to his instructions. You will then take 9 heel-to-toe steps, turn and take 9 heel-to-toe steps back to the start line. This is considered a “Divided Attention” test (i.e you will need to concentrate on two things at one – listening to directions while maintaining the start position but not actually starting).

3.  The last of the SFST’s is the One Leg Stand.  Here the officer will have you maintain a start position while explaining the directions (another “dividend attention” test). Once the officer instructs you to begin, you will raise one leg approximately 6 inches off of the ground with your foot pointed out and count out loud (one-one-thousand, two-one thousand, three-one thousand) until they tell you to stop.  Which is supposed to happen after 30 seconds. 

Now there are some other field sobriety tests that can be requested of you, usually Seattle Police Department Officers will request you complete these tests in addition to the main three.  Typically you will see these from some of the members of the DUI squad.  

The other field sobriety tests include:

·       Add 20 + 21

·       saying ABC’s (not singing),

·       counting backwards between two numbers,

·       finger dexterity (finger to nose),

·       Romberg Test (you stand still with feet together, arms at sides, head back, and eyes closed – the officer will check for swaying).

So how accurate are these field sobriety tests?  Well there was some studies done by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration back in the late 70’s and early 80’s.  Beginning in late 1975, the Southern California Research Institute under the guidance of NHTSA traveled to law enforcement agencies through the US to select the most commonly used field sobriety tests.  Six tests were used in the initial stages of this study.

Laboratory research indicated that three of these tests, when administered in a standardized manner, were a highly accurate and reliable battery of tests for distinguishing alcohol levels about 0.10.  NHTSA analyzed the laboratory test date and found: HGN, by itself, was 77% accurate; WAT, by itself was 68% accurate, and OLS, by itself was 65% accurate.  When HGN and the WAT were combined an 80% accuracy was achieved. 

Now let me preface these results for a minute.  These tests were conducted in controlled environments.  Meaning they were done indoors, on a level surface, with good lighting, and performed by people with nothing to lose.  This is what most police officers, and prosecutors don’t understand.  When a person is on the side of I5, with cars speeding by them, its 20 degree outside, the officers overhead lights on blinking, they are scared and never been in trouble before, facing the strong likelihood of going to jail.  Obviously this is going to affect how a person does on these roadside gymnastics tests.  Imagine taking a test in school, and if you didn’t get a “B” you would go to jail.  That’s a lot of pressure if you ask me.  In addition to that these tests in my opinion are nothing but junk science.  But that’s for another blog. 

In summary, remember to talk to an attorney before you do these tests.  If you have had alcohol to drink, and the police officer smells an odor, chances are you’re going to get arrested for a DUI.  Regardless if you do these tests are not.  So you might as well make things easier on yourself, and your DUI Attorney and politely decline.  If at any time you ever have a question when you’re being investigated by a police officer always ask to speak with an attorney.  Seriously.  You can call me anytime.  24/7.  I will always pick up.  Or you can ask to speak with a public defender.  Usually police officers have that number on speed dial.   

Seattle DUI Attorney

Seattle DUI Deferred Prosecution

Should I consider a DUI Deferred Prosecution?

A Seattle DUI or a Washington DUI for that matter is a very serious offense.  When a person is charged with this particular crime they face a mandatory amount of jail, a mandatory fine, a mandatory license suspension, a mandatory ignition interlock requirement, and period of probation.  These penalties vary depending on the number a prior DUI’s a person has and what the breath or blood alcohol level was. 

            However despite these penalties if a person is charged with a DUI then can choose to enter into what’s called a deferred prosecution.  This allows the accused to defer and potentially avoid all the mandatory jail, fines, and license suspension if they agree to certain terms that are outlined in RCW 10.05.   A person can do a deferred prosecution once in their lifetime for a DUI charge. 

            Now this may seem like a great idea, but a deferred prosecution is very complex resolution with very strict guidelines.  Essentially in order to qualify for a Deferred Prosecution on your Seattle DUI or Washington State DUI the first thing you need to do is a complete an alcohol and drug evaluation.  The results of this evaluation must find that you suffer from alcohol or drug dependence, and that you will enter and complete a 2-year alcohol/drug treatment program.  The cost of this type of programs depends on the individual treatment center where the program will be, whether you have insurance that might cover some of this.  But plan on spending around $3000 - $6000 on this 2-year treatment plan. 

            In addition to the 2-year treatment plan, you will enter into a contract with the Court where you Seattle DUI or Washington State DUI is in.  You will have to agree to a contract between you and the Court that will last 5 years.  During those 5 years if you successfully start and complete the 2-year treatment plan, abstain from alcohol and drugs, monitored by probation, and agree to having a functioning ignition interlock device in your vehicle the Court will dismiss the Seattle DUI or Washington State DUI charge at the end of the 5 years. 

            However if you fail to live up to your end of the bargain, when you enter into the Deferred Prosecution you agree that there are enough facts in the police report to find you guilty, and you waive your right to have a jury trial.  So if at any time during these 5 years it can be shown by a preponderance of evidence that you’re in violation of any of the agreed terms of the Deferred Prosecution the Judge can revoke your deferred and impose all the mandatory penalties allowed by law. 

            Many DUI Attorney’s tell people that a deferred prosecution is a good idea, because they can avoid all the jail and fines, and ultimately get the thing dismissed.  However my firm is very cautious about representing people who might want to consider this option.  In fact as of writing this, of the last 100 DUI’s we have defended only 4 people have entered deferred prosecutions.  That is only 4%.  Why?  Because there are a lot of things at stake and there are certain people who might not make the best candidate for this option. 

            If you’re considering this option or would like more information on entering a deferred prosecution on your Seattle DUI or Washington State DUI, please contact my office immediately.  An experience Seattle DUI Lawyer will be able to answer all of your questions and inform you of whether this might be a good option for you.  

Matthew Leyba | Attorney

Leyba Defense PLLC | Seattle DUI Defense